We are reader-supported. Buying through any red colored link on our site may earn us commissions. Learn More.
I’ve read through a few of your articles and one in particular scared me a fair bit. I’m talking about the one where you compared a VS1 (I think?) diamond against a I3 (again, I think?) diamond and examined the inclusions. Your analysis identified a stark black mark in the VS1 diamond, whilst the I3 looked relatively clean. This really scared me a little bit, as I’ve been looking at getting a diamond online and I always assumed a VS1 would naturally look cleaner than a lower grade.
Ideally, I would like a cushion cut diamond in the D colour range, at least VS2 clarity, at least very good polish and symmetry, around 0.8-1 carat and an ideal cut for around $4,000-$4,500. I’d prefer the diamond to be close to square. I’d probably also be more comfortable if the diamond came with a grading report from GIA or AGS.
I’ve had a look at some diamonds meeting this criteria on James Allen, but my lack of expertise really prevents me from knowing a good diamond from a bad. Some of the diamonds which appear good on paper are clearly not terribly good even to an amateur like me when viewed through the virtual loope on James Allen, and I suppose this concerns me should I ultimately buy sight unseen from another online diamond seller.
I guess what I’m after is some advice on getting a good diamond online, or if you can point me in the direction of a diamond that meets my above criteria that’d be great too!
Thanks for writing! I’ll be very happy to help you out! Here’s what I like for you:
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-SI1-Premium-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1102888.asp – the SI1 is all in the corner
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-SI1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1295006.asp
I’m pretty sure these would be eye clean, so no need to pay for a VS2. Plus, there’s no visual difference between an E and a D, so no need to worry about that either. Let me know what you think!
Thank you very much for your help, and most of all for your quick response!
I had a number of questions I was hopeful you might be able to answer:
In that second diamond you linked me to there is an obvious inclusion near the center of the stone. I have generally avoided such stones due to such an inclusion being so obvious. Do you feel that such inclusions are very unlikely to be seen by the naked eye even close up?
Also, in many of the photos on James Allen there is a noticeable difference in the colour of some of the diamonds (even in the two you linked), is this just a consequence of the photograph or do you believe this reflects different vibrancy or fire in each respective diamond? If so, how can you really tell what makes a good or a bad cushion cut diamond when looking at a photo?
I have done some further research and was looking at a couple of diamonds on Good Old Gold (www.goodoldgold.com), and particularly the two below.
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/7878/
http://www.goodoldgold.com/diamond/8038/
Why is it that these two diamonds look so much prettier than those listed on James Allen? Is this just a consequence of the photography techniques or are they superior diamonds? In line with this, why are these Good Old Gold diamonds so much more expensive than a comparable stone on other websites?
I noticed that on Pricescope people often recommend Good Old Gold, and have even seen people say that there are a large number of poor stones on James Allen (specifically for cushion cuts). What are your thoughts on this?
My thoughts are that it seems like the vast majority of stones on James Allen have a significant number of inclusions noted on their GIA reports as compared to some stones available on other online diamond providers (Union Diamond, Blue Nile, Excel Diamonds, etc). Even where a diamond is quite good it seems to have an extremely thick girdle, which I don’t believe is ideal.
In line with the above, the ring design will look like the below. Given the design and the fact that the diamond will be mounted under a bezel how much of a concern is girdle thickness, and specifically an extremely thick girdle?
Obviously, any diamond will have inclusions and blemishes. What do you consider to be unnoticeable or minor inclusions/blemishes? Essentially, which ones should you avoid at all costs?
Would you be hesitant to buy a cushion cut diamond, sight unseen simply based off a positive set of numbers in the GIA report? ie like the below?
Can you provide any suggestions as to what I should look for in terms of depth and table when trying to identify a good cushion cut diamond? I get the impression that there aren’t really any industry standard figures unlike some other diamond shapes, which makes me wonder how websites classify a cushion cut diamond as an ideal or excellent cut?
I know it is probably a psychological thing, but my fiancee would prefer a diamond in the VS range at worst. Would you be able to suggest a couple that you think would be good?
I’m so sorry for the long post, but I’m finding cushion cuts incredibly complicated to get my head around compared to simpler shapes.
I really appreciate your help!
The inclusion in the center of the stone is too small to be visible to the naked eye.
The color in the JA photos is just a photography effect.
GOG is expensive because they own their inventory (as opposed to JA). Also, their cushions are special cuts, and special cuts always carry a premium.
They look nice because they’re special cuts that were designed to look nice in photographs. I’ve never seen them in person, so I can’t comment on how the look in real life.
I don’t follow pricescope because the vast majority of people there don’t really know what they’re talking about, they’re just regurgitating stuff they learned on pricescope from other people who don’t really know what they’re talking about. “Prosumers” as they like to call themselves are people who’ve bought one or two diamonds in their life, but spend their days hanging out in diamond forums online. You can only because an expert in diamonds by actually handling diamonds.
Extremely thick girdles are quite common in cushions and not a problem. The GIA certified stone from GOG you linked to also has one.
Have you read my cushion cut article? https://www.diamonds.pro/education/cushion-cut/
You can’t buy a cushion sight unseen. It’d be a huge mistake.
……
Oh, and btw, here are some exquisite looking cushions on JA (if you like the look of the stones from GOG):
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1377278.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1281483.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1285076.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1281064.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1289926.asp
Thanks for the suggestions, and information provided Ira. Those diamonds do look great!
To me the presence of lots of inclusions is kind of off-putting, but is this feeling perhaps a bit silly? I mean some diamonds obviously have more inclusions than others, but is this essentially something you shouldn’t worry about where they are not easily visible even under magnification? I feel like you are paying for an inferior product if it has a number of inclusions.
Out of these suggestions which do you believe is the best? Which would you choose?
A VS1 is extremely small. It would probably take you a minute to find the inclusion if you were to look through a loupe.
I like either one of these two the best:
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1377278.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/F-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1281064.asp
Just depends on how much you want to spend!
I was having a bit more of a look at James Allen as my fiancee said she’d really like an E colour (as opposed to F).
What do you think of these diamonds? Are they better than some of the others you’ve suggested? Which would you choose?
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1375791.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1298886.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1285076.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1280937.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1319085.asp
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1362074.asp
These all look fantastic. It’s a difficult choice. I would say that you should decide first whether you want the go with the lower or higher price point (ie, either 80 or 90 pointer). Then within those groups, just go with the cheapest one, as I dont really see anything that stands out on any one stone.
So after some discussion with my fiancee and some thought I’m leaning towards the below diamond.
https://www.jamesallen.com/diamonds/E-VS1-Ideal-Cut-Cushion-Diamond-1285076.asp
What are your thoughts? I’m curious to hear if you think that maybe the table or depth are too high on this one? How are these likely to impact the visuals of the diamond?
The stone looks amazing to me.
Isn’t excessive depth in a diamond typically a bad thing?
Yes, but this isn’t excessive. It’s perfectly normal for a cushion cut.
Thanks a lot Ira!
I’ve placed the order and will let you know how it looks when I finally get it!
Sounds great!
Before you buy a diamond, get personal buying advice from industry veterans. We'll help you get the best diamond for the money.
DISCLAIMER: We don't use your email for marketing. Period.
Please enter your email address to receive your 25% off coupon code:
Here is your coupon code: GFDSF3GF